12 Apr, 2011
We, civil society organizations including Associations and Non-Governmental Organizations, highly appreciate that state-civil society cooperation has been a key factor in the development of Cambodia from a war-torn country to a peaceful vibrant developing country. Many times government and civil society organizations have had different opinions but met in constructive discussions, and more frequently still, government and civil society organizations have met in good cooperation.
The proposed NGO legislation indicates a departure from this successful path. Civil society organizations, including associations and NGOs, are very concerned that the law in its second draft gives far-reaching power to the authorities to control the rights of citizens to organize and express themselves. These rights are set out in the Cambodia Constitution (article 31, 35, 42) and international treaties that Cambodia has signed, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (article 2(1)) and the International Convention on Citizens and Political Rights (ICCPR) (article 14, 22).
Civil Society in Cambodia is diverse; there are different types of organizations, associations, groups, interests and positions. This diversity is our strength, and demonstrates the important range of perspectives the sector contributes to Cambodia’s development. We have now collectively drawn together voices from this broad base into all our discussions on the NGO Law, and there have been many responses. Some organizations decided they would make a strong case that there was no need for the law, some organizations decided to engage with the government consultation in an attempt to improve the law, some organizations chose to
lobby on behalf of their specific issues within the law. All these organizations have kept a dialogue
throughout, respecting each other’s perspectives – this is what democracy is about.
Today we all stand together: whatever our separate approaches in addressing our concerns about the proposed law, our opinion is united -the draft law we now see before us is unacceptable and we cannot support it in its current form.
We understand that a sovereign state such as Cambodia has the right to promulgate laws, regulations and practices in accordance with international democratic principles. However, the process of enacting laws must respect those democratic principles. Moreover the Law itself must not infringe upon the fundamental rights of the people, including their rights to freedom of association and freedom of expression. The social and economic development of Cambodia in recent years would never have happened if the opportunities to freely organize and express opinions had been curtailed. Successful development of societies worldwide goes handin-
hand with increased openness.
The second draft Law on Associations and Non-Governmental Organizations in its current form fails to respect these fundamental rights.
We would like to point out three main areas of concern in the current second draft Law:
1. Registration is mandatory and complex, rather than voluntary and simple
2. There is no appeal process for the denial of registration
3. Key terms in the law are left undefined, and many sections are vague
Article 6 on Prohibiting Provisions of the second draft law remains effectively unchanged. It continues to prohibit any activity conducted by unregistered associations and NGOs. Registration is thus mandatory and unregistered groups are banned. The draft law’s mandatory registration requirements constitute restrictions on the freedom of association which violate the principles Cambodia has promised to adhere to under Article 22 of the ICCPR. Under Article 22, as well as other major international conventions, “freedom of association is a right, and not something that must first be granted by the government to citizens.”
Articles 17 and 32, which deal with applications for registration and requests for memoranda of
understanding, lack important safeguards (objective standards for review and denial of registration and the right to appeal to a competent and independent court). These articles undermine Article 65 of Civil Code.
During the consultation process, the civil society organizations have clearly pointed out these weaknesses but to no avail. We are deeply disappointed that the second draft fails to address these main areas of concern.
We, the undersigned NGOs and Associations therefore collectively and respectfully call on the Royal Government of Cambodia to reconsider our key asks and incorporate them in the third draft of the Law. We also ask that the third draft be shared publicly before it is approved by the Council of Ministers or by the National Assembly.
NGOs and Associations stand ready to use our democratic rights to express our discontent through democratic and peaceful means.
The proposed NGO legislation indicates a departure from this successful path. Civil society organizations, including associations and NGOs, are very concerned that the law in its second draft gives far-reaching power to the authorities to control the rights of citizens to organize and express themselves. These rights are set out in the Cambodia Constitution (article 31, 35, 42) and international treaties that Cambodia has signed, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (article 2(1)) and the International Convention on Citizens and Political Rights (ICCPR) (article 14, 22).
Civil Society in Cambodia is diverse; there are different types of organizations, associations, groups, interests and positions. This diversity is our strength, and demonstrates the important range of perspectives the sector contributes to Cambodia’s development. We have now collectively drawn together voices from this broad base into all our discussions on the NGO Law, and there have been many responses. Some organizations decided they would make a strong case that there was no need for the law, some organizations decided to engage with the government consultation in an attempt to improve the law, some organizations chose to
lobby on behalf of their specific issues within the law. All these organizations have kept a dialogue
throughout, respecting each other’s perspectives – this is what democracy is about.
Today we all stand together: whatever our separate approaches in addressing our concerns about the proposed law, our opinion is united -the draft law we now see before us is unacceptable and we cannot support it in its current form.
We understand that a sovereign state such as Cambodia has the right to promulgate laws, regulations and practices in accordance with international democratic principles. However, the process of enacting laws must respect those democratic principles. Moreover the Law itself must not infringe upon the fundamental rights of the people, including their rights to freedom of association and freedom of expression. The social and economic development of Cambodia in recent years would never have happened if the opportunities to freely organize and express opinions had been curtailed. Successful development of societies worldwide goes handin-
hand with increased openness.
The second draft Law on Associations and Non-Governmental Organizations in its current form fails to respect these fundamental rights.
We would like to point out three main areas of concern in the current second draft Law:
1. Registration is mandatory and complex, rather than voluntary and simple
2. There is no appeal process for the denial of registration
3. Key terms in the law are left undefined, and many sections are vague
Article 6 on Prohibiting Provisions of the second draft law remains effectively unchanged. It continues to prohibit any activity conducted by unregistered associations and NGOs. Registration is thus mandatory and unregistered groups are banned. The draft law’s mandatory registration requirements constitute restrictions on the freedom of association which violate the principles Cambodia has promised to adhere to under Article 22 of the ICCPR. Under Article 22, as well as other major international conventions, “freedom of association is a right, and not something that must first be granted by the government to citizens.”
Articles 17 and 32, which deal with applications for registration and requests for memoranda of
understanding, lack important safeguards (objective standards for review and denial of registration and the right to appeal to a competent and independent court). These articles undermine Article 65 of Civil Code.
During the consultation process, the civil society organizations have clearly pointed out these weaknesses but to no avail. We are deeply disappointed that the second draft fails to address these main areas of concern.
We, the undersigned NGOs and Associations therefore collectively and respectfully call on the Royal Government of Cambodia to reconsider our key asks and incorporate them in the third draft of the Law. We also ask that the third draft be shared publicly before it is approved by the Council of Ministers or by the National Assembly.
NGOs and Associations stand ready to use our democratic rights to express our discontent through democratic and peaceful means.
No comments:
Post a Comment